Jesus . Paul, Socrates by Plato, fucius by Mencius, and Laotse by Cse. In all four cases, t eao books or e very little, and to develop trines and e long and profound discourses. Cse, ed from Laotses deat quite tly a porary of Mencius. Yet t curious t alters mentioime, ioned by ther in his works.

        On tse must be sidered test prose er of ty, as C be sidered test poet. o tios botyle and t. t explains t t altest slanderer of fucius, aest antagonist of fu ideas, no fu sc openly or secretly admired    openly agree erature.

        Nor    it be said truly t a pure-blooded Ce disagree ses ideas. taoism is not a s C is a deep, fual trait of Ctitude tooy. It ical sense of proportions; it enricry and imagination in an immeasurable manner, and it gives a pion to ic, vagabond C provides tic release from traint, and s t, and . As more people fail t t in a lame and ing manner aoist ideas are more often at    succeeds only aoist seng Kuofan, t fu general aoist y t o ant generals.

        Cse is tant as t one ic tained in tse. Uical questions of gover and personal morality, aping iure before ticism raits in it, like    t plation and "seeing tary" explain ive C of tudy of trikes mysticism    seems    skipped tific study of nature to reacuitive clusion by insig is not surprising t Albert Einstein and Cse agree, as agree t, on tivity of all standards. t Eiakes on t and, to a Cupid ical proof, ivity, er developed by estern p decades.

        A    be added about Cses attitude to    to any reader t est romanticizers of ory, and t any of tes ells about fucius, or Laotse or t be accepted on a par es ells about tion of General Clouds and Great Nebulous, or bet of t of t must be also plainly uood t     fantasy, ion and for t er kno he is frivolous when he is profound and profound when he is frivolous.

        ta of Cse sists of ty-ters, all of ture of pion and aes or parables. ters taining t virulent attacks on fuism (not included extual critics"    t seven cers. to uand because it is to talk of fery. One    rest assured t textual critics" are uific because very little of it is picism, but sists of opinions as to style and o attack fucius only in a mild and polisype of "criticism" in my long introdu to tory.) Only one or t, er interpolations and t is a subjective assertion of opinion. Even tions of style are faulty, and at least a distin serpolations and side t seven cers, and it    even occurred to tics to provide an anso o be sure t even t eloquent exposition of t as fery,    tse, o do lemen." On tes er geions into tremely loose structure of ters.

        I ers, including all but one of t best seven cers. ition, ters are translated plete. t important are ters on "Levelling All tumn Floods." ters, "Joioes," "runks" and "tolerance" belong in one group est against civilization. t eloquent protest is tained in "Opening trunks," ically taoistic is ter on "tolera mystid deeply religious piece is "t Supreme." t beautifully ten is "Autumn Floods." t is ter on "Deformities" (a typically "romanticist" t delig fantastic is t cer, "A ses parables in ters    Phis volume.

        I ranslation on t of    A. Giles. It soon became apparent in my    Giles ion    yle     untouake my oranslation, taking advantage of ill I o debt to my predecessor, and ably succeeded in t task in many passages.    co be different. In translation may be regarded as my own.

        It sed t t text, Giles translates " means God. On term "Creator" is a rendering of ces t go into details of translation of oterms here.
请记住本书首发域名：966xs.com。966小说手机版阅读网址：wap.966xs.com